I need from Jan 1-Present
i wasnt talking about a newspaper. is there some resource?
I need from Jan 1-Present
i wasnt talking about a newspaper. is there some resource?
Parents underestimate the influence their own drinking habits have on their children's attitude to alcohol, government research suggests.
A Department for Children, Families and Schools study suggests children from heavy-drinking households are more likely to use alcohol themselves.
And half of young people who have drunk alcohol were given it by their parents.
It comes as ministers urge parents to help their children make sensible decisions about drinking alcohol.
The department commissioned research to get a clearer idea of the attitudes and use of alcohol among parents and young people.
The study was based on 4,000 interviews with parents, children and young people.
It also found that eight out of 10 parents had no pre-planned strategies to tackle irresponsible drinking by their children.
One in four of the children interviewed said their parents had never talked to them about alcohol.
While the majority of parents said they were fully aware of their child's drinking habits, one in 10 said they were unaware if their child had drunk alcohol.
The research is being published as part of a campaign to tackle under-age drinking.
Schools Minister Vernon Coaker said: "Today's research shows that parents underestimate their influence over their child's drinking and attitudes to alcohol, yet a quarter of young people have never spoken to their parents about the issue.
"That's why through the Why Let Drink Decide? campaign we are giving parents and young people the confidence to have open conversations about alcohol, to ultimately delay the age at which young people start drinking."
My mum and her whole side of the family don't touch alcohol at all, she was always going on about how bad it is, how it's a waste of money. My dad used to drink a lot and in some cases got violent, which I have seen. However, I don't mind alcohol and don't mind drinking it every now and again with my friends. I don't see myself as having a problem with alcohol at all. Over two years I've only had it on three occasions, and on all three of those occasions I've not had enough to get drunk (I'm not a lightweight as it seems). I don't think my parents know about my drinking habits, but my mom does know that I have no problem with drinking.
What's the average age that kids start drinking these days anyway? The first time I tried it I was 13. I'm not a big fan of vodka however, unless it's with something else like coke.
when i have to fly, which is not very often, i would prefer to get there safely, and not be killed by an extremist with explosive stuffed inside himself, and scanners should prevent this new trait
It is an infringement of our privacy and human rights, I've just tried to cancel my BA holiday to the states, despite it being more than 3 months away I'm told the cancellation fee is 60% of the total cost of the holiday!!
Maybe the powers-that-be should take that religious offence cop-out and say "we don't care anymore;for the good of the majority,accept the scan or don't fly."
The scanners, which are already in place at Heathrow and Manchester Airports, could also break discrimination laws as well as breaching passengers' rights to privacy, the commission said.
U-turn for Brown yet again?
Why don't the phobics stay at home and not fly?
If you are shy then do not fly.
I do not want my bits on show to total strangers thank you…
They might has well get everyone to strip off in a room and do a good job….
army personnel have been killed this way, the body scanners don't pick up whats inside.
could you please write a feature article describing a property in your local area for the purpose of selling the property about 300 words …plzz help me with that because i don't know how to write it or rather what should i write… english is my second language so it's really really hard for me plzzzzz helppp
A wonderfull opportunity has arisen in the The Hill area of Johannesburg! Property investors will be vying for a chance to get their hands on this gem. The elegant mansion is in the prestigious gated community known as The Hill, where armed guards patrol 24/7 and each home is fitted with state of the art alarm systems……….. now go on to describe the rooms, garden, bathrooms and anything else you fancy. Good luck!
Tags: Help me plzzz to write a feature article about describing?
Posted in smo | No Comments »
Most people don't mind as it surely will deter or catch terrorists. But what if it's a false sense of security? These people go to a lot of trouble. Criminals always seem to find a way around any obstacles.
Just because it might provide a false sense of security is no reason not to introduce them. After all, they will not only help catch potential terrorists, but drug smugglers and other criminals, who cause the deaths of thousands of people each year. As this is the case, I think it's worth it. Just remind people that they are not fool proof, and they should keep being vigilant and report any suspicious behaviour.
One is to earn money for the manufacturers of the machines, (check out the shareholders) and the other, bigger reason, is to get people used to being treated like a herd of potentially dangerous animals, as is their status in the Police State that Orwell predicted, which is coming true, a few decades behind schedule..
There were body scanners at the airport the Christmas underwear bomber boarded, but he went through without even being searched.
If you were a few years older you'd remember a time when this sort of thing would be seen as it was, an invasion of privacy and freedom, and a presumption of guilt, and not tolerated.
But slowly all the apparatus of a police state is being erected around us, some blatantly and some surreptitiously, as we meekly look on, fooled by this ridiculous scam
-"the war on terror".
As Benjamin Franklyn said:
"Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase some temporary safety. neither deserve nor will get either."
(They don't take away your water and medications, make you walk in stocking feet, or take other useless measures.)
"You can easily do what we do. You don't have to replace anything. You have to add just a little bit – technology, training….
But you have to completely change the way you go about doing airport security…."
If you fly, there are so many reasons to read this article.
As others above pointed out, it's only a matter of time before terrorists get around the invasive body scanners. Meanwhile, the innocent travelling public has yet another useless procedure foisted upon them. The time has come to demand an intelligent, effective security approach.
The scanners, which are already in place at Heathrow and Manchester Airports, could also break discrimination laws as well as breaching passengers' rights to privacy, the commission said.
Told you it wouldn't take long, didn't I?
Bottler Brown will now have to u-turn yet again, man must be getting dizzy.
Secondly what about your children, they will be seen naked, is that acceptable, no i don't think so, also what about Muslim women who wear the full Burkha, are they exempt, if so why?
sorry we are getting to the point our lives are being monitored 24/7 and i don't think this is
the Britain we want, after all millions died in the name of democracy and freedom so why the hell should one be subjected to this indignity.
and the scanners will not show up explosives that are shoved up someones anus, as that seems to be common practice now of getting past security gates at military bases, as has been proven.
as someone just pointed out there have been objections from Muslim groups, and surely they are the people who are mostly likely to be in the frame.
Being seen naked? the person who looks at the image is no where near the x ray machine. They could be in a different part of the building, so the security guys standing near you are not going to see your body. And your facial features are not going to show up in an x ray
Muslims….Tough!! They must be scanned too. Most of the trouble we have nowadays is caused by their religious fanatics so to hell with their views. If they want to be treated equally then they must conform to our rules. And if the goverment let any of them off with it then that is just going to make matters worse. If you have nothing to hide then what's the problem.
Kids….No one wants the idea of their children been seen by weirdos, but I'm sure they will be police checked, and again, like I have already said, the person is not sitting next to them, and can't see their faces. It's going to be a fact of life that the world has changed and we must to things beyond our normal activities to keep it a safer place.
The fact is that there will always be a way for the criminal to get round this, but also there will be another more intelligent way to combat that too. We can't be lax and let these murdering animals beat us.
I hope they can see inside too so they can detect anything inserted into the anus.
One thing that annoys me is that after the time they stopped us taking too much liquids on board, why do they allow "some". Why take the risk of allowing people to take on 100mls of ….make up, face cleanser, etc. This stuff is not a necessity on board, neither is lipstick in which things could be hidden. Or are some women so vain that they are willing to risk getting blown to bits just because they want to look good?
But are people really sure other people in their families such as teenagers and ladies may not like the idea as much.
Something tells me that some people assume they will not be selected to be scanned, and I think they may not like it if they are picked.
But couldn't they smuggle stuff internally like druggies do?
Do these body scans actually x-ray inside as well.?
And maybe I got this wrong but i thought some Muslims were objecting on the grounds of religion and everyone knows that the UK govt hates to offend !!
Despite the holiday being more than 3 months away I was told I would be charged 60% of the total cost of the holiday!!!
The new scanning is pointless, these nutters are going to blow themselves up anyway so it wouldn't take too much for them to get surgically implanted items they need and it would be invisible to all the new scanning regimes!
Although it is just something else for people to evade. It's all very well having body scanners, but if the person checking it misses something then it's as much use as no use.
before you know it, you'll be having to go throught a body scanner just to visit your local tescos.
As much as we might moan at being delayed at airports for security reasons, i would prefer that they were over cautious, than not!!
They want more people to travel in personal transport
may be aircraft manufacturers want rich segment to buy personal aircrafts
You really couldn't make this stuff up.
You've got that exactly right hog b by the way.
Tags: People keep asking about the body scanners at airports?
Posted in smo | No Comments »
What is the best free online website to use if I were to check my current credit rating? ? thanks
Here you can check your 3-in-1 Report from all three credit reporting agencies and your credit score.
Hope this help,
what concrete steps must be taken by government and corporation in order to address this situation
2. STOP RESERVATIONS …. ONLY MERIT SHALL BE THE CRITERIA
3. GIVE UP RED TAPISM AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4. NO POLITICAL INTERFERENCE SHOULD BE THERE IN EMPLOYMENT
5. ENSURE BETTER PAY AND AMENITIES FOR THE EMPLOYEES
IF THESE STEPS ARE TAKEN BY GOVT. FORTHWITH THE SITUATION IS
LIKELY TO IMPROVE.
The Telegraph, the Mail, The Sun, The Express, the Times, others
-just about all of them except the Guardian, Independent and Mirror.
Whatever happened to Sisterhood or are the biggest oppressors of women actually happen to be other women?
My opinion is if a woman should accept some sort of responsibility over being raped, then householders must take some of the blame for being burgled. After all it would never have happened if people stopped keeping all those robable goodies in their homes.
Rapist = Criminal
Victim = Victim
It also ignores the fact that perfectly sedately dressed women,old age pensioners,women in their own homes etc have all fallen foul of rapists.Rapists set out to rape.They have a different mindset to decent men.Decent men do not contrive to take advantage of a woman purely for the purpose of raping them.It would be like saying women think men in general are incapable of controlling themselves.
You wouldn't blame someone for being murdered because they took a short cut up a dark lane.
The woman dresses in a provocative manner in order to attract male attention.
The man and woman drink alcohol together which lowers inhibition.
They both enjoy the foreplay but then the woman changes her mind and says, "No".
If the man is too drunk to understand this then he would be incapable of performing.
If he is not that drunk then he does understand. If he takes it further then this is rape!!
The Sisterhood and all humankind should understand this.
No further discussion is required.
I went on a date with a man who I quite liked and wanted to kiss and cuddle him but not have sex with him and then suddenly he grabbed my arm and held me down and I just about managed to get away. I didn't report him as I knew I would just get the blame from the police and men in the law profession, so if women don't support women, then who will?
Before what happened to me and before I heard how the police and lawyers talk about rape victims, I might have said women who were raped had some blame but now I don't. Unless you think that men are animals with no self control and all women should be scared of them.
Rape is a horrible thing to experience and nobody should have to go through that but there are ways of avoiding it in certain circumstances.
Sinister. If a homeowner leaves their front door wide open with expensive things laying out in the open chances are very high that they will be stolen. It doesn't remove the blame from the burglar but it makes the homeowner partially responsible because they acted irresponsible. If you leave your car door unlocked with a priceless painting sitting inside of it can you really expect the painting to be there the next day? Expecting people to act responsibly with their things (or body) is not beyond reasonable.
would men say the same about men who got raped by men , would they say he was asking for it dancing all provocatively and that tight t shirt . no chance men would stand together .. sisterhood is dead and buried women do not like other women
an old lady in my town got her house broken into in the middle of the night and got raped . men should control themselves and women should have more sense than oppress other women
That means she can wear what she likes, she can be involved in foreplay, she can get naked and get into bed with a man. But until the point of penetration she has the right to say no.
If women dont believe that it is understandable to see why there are such low convictions in this country.
Unpopular however as this may be there does have to be a case where you are responsible for your own actions.
One case that springs to mind is the woman recently who talked online with a man about how much she wanted group sex,got him to arrange it with his mates,travelled to his house then cried rape.
Yes no should mean no but this is the real world.
However all this business of girls ''asking for it'' cos they get drunk and wear short skirts is nonsense.
Plus all these stories of women falsely claiming rape doesnt help the cause at all
@ jess – still nothing! Change your provider1
if a political party in down in the poles they say they don't count
but as soon as they are up in the poles they are happy
I don't believe them
It's like saying – "well – if you will live in a big house – of course you're going to get burgled…"
If you get into bed with a man how can it be rape.
Women think they can go in public half naked and not provoke a rape situation. There are some really sick & uncontrolled people out there and they take people dressed provocative as an invitation to have s-x.
Just last week I saw a woman, mid day, down town in a transparent short night gown, black bra and thong. She was walking across the street into a shop & she was with some other people that were normally dressed.
My wife & I couldn't believe it.
If that isn't looking for trouble then what is.
with hopsital gowns getting a high fashion makoever by Ben di' Lisi
what other everyday items would you like to see get madeover? telephone boxes? Buses?
anything you can think of which is a bit boring or ugly which you would like to see with a new refreshed look
Pharmacists..these guys/gals need to loosen up, smile and lose the white coat with name badge thing, stating that hey they are "pharmacists", get over yourself.
Old people…lets see just a few even, stating that they love Lady Gaga, they wear Primark, they drive at the speed limit at least, and that they love Subway meals.
Do networks count people in their tally of people who tunes into their station if the television is off but the person watching left the channel on the station?
The Nielsen company distributes a special box to a random sampling of families across the country. With the family's permission, the box is connected their TV, where it collects statistics about what channels are watched at what time. It only collects statistics when the TV is on – if the TV is off, no one's watching it, regardless of what station it may have been tuned to last. The data is then collected by Nielsen Co. and turned into viewing numbers and other aggregate statistics for the networks.
One Nielsen family represents a few thousand households.
Unfortunately the Nielsen's boxes do not work with DVRs, so their data is becoming less and less relevant.
It seems to me that Iran wants a nuke so it can become a bigger bully in the playground but the Usa are trying to squish all attempts but failing.
So why doesnt Usa just invade as the saying goes "better to be safe than sorry"… who knows we could stick a bit of oil in there as a reward
Iran along with other Islamic states believe that Israel is an illegal state, and thus should not exist. (They do actually have a strong argument, even though their actions of terrorism is wrong). The US support Israel and because Iran are getting closer to a nuclear weapon, Israel and the US are frightened because Ahmadinejad (leader of Iran) and his other muslim cleric leaders are the sort of leaders that might use one, because they have what is called a theocracy were we; the US and the UK have a democracy. If Iran were to get WMD, they would more than likely use it against Israel and that would cause a nuclear war, and probably destroy most of humanity, and the likes of China and Russia will get involved.
The USA and the west don't care much for freedom really, well not anymore..i think they don't like iran because iran is an obstacle to their goals.
So basically we have a group of corrupt western nations V fundamentalist Islam(which would likely include russia, pakistan and maybe china for the ride)
I want to add to respond to the comments made below..
The reason why the USA, UK and Israel can have nuclear weapons is because they are not threatning to wipe another nation off the face of the planet or drive them to destruction into the sea! All of which, iran has confessed too!
The Israeli's have said that they will never allow a Arab Nuclear bomb, and would bomb the nuclear sites once they found them, but the USA said no we will bomb the sites ,and have a bomb twice the size of two double decker buses to destroy the 6 mile nuclear facility .
It is now all about getting a reason to attack Iran, and no credible reason has yet been found, and Iran is not another Iraq where there was plenty of reasons to attack them…
The USA and the UK have nuclear bombs and so why not Iran, but this comment that we are the good guys and can be trusted with nuclear weapons is pathetic?
1. Last Spring, Rose Gottemoeller, an assistant secretary of state and Washington's chief nuclear arms negotiator, asked Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel refused.
2. The United Nations passed a resolution calling on Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to submit to inspections. Israel refused.
3. The IAEA asked Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to submit to inspections. Israel refused.
4. Iran's formal notification to the IAEA of the planned construction of the backup fuel-rod facility underscores that Iran is playing by the rules of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which Iran has signed.
5. Iran allows IAEA inspections of all its facilities.
6. Contrary to face-saving claims, it appears that the US and Israel were both caught off guard by Iran's announcement. The reasoning is simple. Had the US or Israel announced the existence of he new facility before Iran's notified the IAEA, it would have put Iran on the defensive. As it is now, the US and Israel seem to be playing catch up, casting doubt on the veracity of Israel's claims to "know" that Iran is a nuclear threat.
7. The IAEA and all 16 United States Intelligence Agencies are unanimous in agreement that Iran is not building and does not possess nuclear weapons.
8. In 1986, Mordachai Vanunu blew the whistle and provided photographs showing Israel's clandestine nuclear weapons factory underneath the reactor at Dimona.
9. Israel made the same accusations against Iraq that it is making against Iran, leading up to Israel's bombing of the power station at Osirik. Following the invasion of 2003, international experts examined the ruins of the power station at Osirik and found no evidence of a clandestine weapons factory in the rubble.
10. The United Nations has just released the Goldstone Report, a scathing report which accuses Israel of 37 specific war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza earlier this year. Israel has denounced the report as "Anti-Semitic (even though Judge Goldstone is himself Jewish), and the United States will block the report from being referred to the War Crimes Tribunal at the Hague, thereby making the US Government an accessory after-the-fact.
We all need to be Joe Wilson right now. We need to stand up and scream, "LIAR!" at every politician and every talking media moron that is pushing this war in Iran. And we need to keep dong it until they get the message that we will not be deceived any more.
Israel wants to send your kids off to die in Iran, and YOU are the only one that can stop them.
Please forward this comment to your social networks
to many rules of war now that the other side don't follow
human rights and all that
the only way you can fight terrorists wars is by doing the same
they hide behind civilians but of course you cant shoot civilians
but we will never win wars with out casualties
america/Israel do no like the idea. America can not squash the nuclear program . Israel is tentative and also nervous . Iran wants to regain the glory of Persian empire
USA = good
please give me a full story or facts about freedom of the press please !!!!!!!!
Some people are p!ssed about being seen naked but surely thats what you should be more worried about?? Especially people who fly alot, won't it be really dangerous for them?
supposedly it is very weak.
I don't think I'm reading it wrong, as it says he was caught buggering a girl hard in his room. Buggering means anal sex, doesn't it? Why would his father say something like that? Do you think Madonna or somebody who hates him put that part in?
Ritchie, who is dyslexic, was expelled from Stanbridge Earls School, one of the most prominent institutions specialising in dyslexia in the UK, at the age of 15. He has stated that drug use was the reason for the expulsion; his father, however, has said that it was because his son was caught "cutting class and buggering a girl really really hard in his room."[
It's about eight lines down from the top on here
They kept saying his real name was 'Desmond' not Jonas and at the bottom they made a separate section called "Fishing" which went along the lines of "Desmond is credited with catching the legendary whale 'Moby Dick' He is also the winner of the 'World fisherman's' award every year since 1753"
Edit: Lol! I spelt Basshunter wrong. Fail.
After all catching Moby Dick is impressive —-being expelled for buggering is not.
And yep buggering means anal sex—-doubt it was Madonna.
It might have been her new toyboy Jesus—he looks a bit shifty
hey cool huh… hate the creep anyhows..
Without freedom of the press, then we become slaves to whoever controls the press & we never know the truth about things.
N. Korea keeps their people thinking whatever the govt tells them by controlling the news media
An example is how freedom of the press sunk the Obama take over of our health care system and is now exposing the fraud about climate change. Without freedom, we the people would have these things rammed down our throats by the crooks who rule over us.
Also the only way to keep check on vagaries of politicians
i saw it online but i didnt think it was true. This is my first time using this on yahoo so u no. I just want to know if they r. That would explian SO much! lol
search it on google.
some things say that he is her dad, or uncle. but its not true.
she just mentions him once in her song Tik Tok.
Hope i helped:)
Is Fox growing in popularity or is CNN and MSNBC failing?
I personally think it's the lack of honesty with MSNBC and to a lesser extent CNN's dishonesty. Our society is now much more educated and they are better able to detect bogus reporting.
I keep hearing that MSNBC is getting ready to close their doors due to their poor showing and wonder what is so hard about just being fair and balanced? What is motivating them to run themselves into the ground?
Americans like fair and balanced news. Fox always shows both sides of issues and allows us to make up our own minds. CNN and MSNBC are plain lazy, just reporting certain issues, leaving other issues out completely, and allowing personal bias to spin what they report.
What bothers me the most is how CNN and MSNBC leave out so much of what is going on in the world.
The average age of an O'Reilly Factor viewer (I know he's not primetime news, but I still think the stat is relevant) is 73. Seventy-three. The average lifespan of an American is 78. That means that the average O'Reilly viewer is statistically closer to death than he is to working.
Also, for all the talk of being fair and balanced, Fox News is incredibly biased. It shamelessly panders to the far end of the political spectrum, and since it's a big country there's a lot of people who love it. But you have to remember that no more than a few percent of the country is watching any of the news networks at any one time. Even if Fox News had 100% of the market share, that would still leave it less influential on the next election than Youtube.
CNN is the cloesest to not being partial to anyone.
MSNBC is just downright funny when Keith O gets on a rag against someone.
I still read the paper to understand the news as these shows are all just one sided in the presentation of the facts, or lack of facts.
Most of America is Conservative its why FOX is Succeeding.
It happens because there are simply very bad people in the world.
At this point in time the terrorists we have are mostly from Radical Islam and they think they are doing their god a favor and taking over the world for him. They are teaching their children from very little to do this and to hate people that are not of their religion. This is about 10% of Islamic people, but since there are 3 1/2 billion islamic folks the radical ones are quite a few.
They basically can not be stopped, except by killing them as they think nothing of their own lives as long as they can kill some of us. Since they train their children this way they have an endless supply of suicide bombers. The parents don't seem to care that their kids are blowing themselves up for their religion, so it is really hopeless.
We basically can only fight them when we find them doing something.
Give up your iPod for Lent, bishops urge … Church leaders are encouraging people to give up their iPods for Lent, instead of more traditional vices such as chocolate, to help save the planet.
And regards eating it at all? Well, that is an interesting question. As I suppose it gives pleasure (like wine and cigarettes for some) it might be considered to be a vice. I know I've heard many people say it is! It then suggests that frugality and simple eating must be nearer to God, in which case, it might be better to leave your city or town and go and live in a cave, like a hermit, reading and writing religious text and meditating.
A bit like going to confess your sins because you had 'carnal thoughts' about the attractive girl down the road.
Everything's ok unless you do it to excess in my book. I certainly wouldn't call eating a certain type of food a vice.
Alcohol, smoking, gluttony – chocolate must come under that, but smoking & drinking could be considered damaging to society, as well as the planet.
Giving up an iPod?
I haven't got one….so there you go I have seen the light.
a serial offender
Most def, LESS SAFE!
He's a lawyer who THINKS criminals derserve special "strikes" before they are taken "out". TOO MANY STRIKES if you ask me. Like they do in Europe.
Pathetic….in my opinion
But no matter who the President is, this is basically a very safe country. Despite 9/11, under Bush, under Obama, etc. the defenses of the country are the about the same. The President is the Commander in Chief regardless. I don't think terrorists care who the President is, our politics probably only affect them a little. (I mean terrorists in the field who might attack, not other country's governments who might be more affected by policy.)
Bush started us down this road to destruction and Obama has pushed the accelerator to the floor with his bad programs and excessive spending.
We need someone in the white house who isn't a financial idiot. You can not spend your way out of a recession. Can't be done.
The man is a coward before the raidcal Islamic elements and they have not fear of us at all. We are in for it .
I find that I go to other stores more often when I know that Wal-Mart is cheaper. After watching the news today, I think I know why. They are eliminating other brands and going with their own store brand. The new report said they are going with their store brand and only one other retail brand in many areas of the store… with the retail brand not being the one most popular but the one that funnels most money into Wal-Mart advertising. —> Case in point… Arm & Hammer laundry detergent… in my opinion is about as good as water with a little spit. Wal-Mart pulled it off the shelf
If all of that is true, it seems like the first time Wal-Mart has made a marketing blunder. Remember the blunder with the "New Coke" that was an obvious failure to almost all consumers before they trashed the idea many months later. It's almost unconceivable that our largest retailer is following this boondoggle. I think it is great for competitors but I think Wal-Mart is missing the numbers because they are focusing on the bad economy which has led them down this path and as we emerge, they will probably find they have lost market share and emboldened their competitors.
It was all very subtle with me. Little by little I couldn't find my favorite brands and thought they must be sold out. Eventually I realized they were not carrying those brands and with the news today it confirmed my observation. I do have to admit that I'm a little sick of looking for toothpaste and having to read the label on each and every brand to get the right one. Ditto the toilet paper… the large, the giant, the jumbo, the soft, the fragrance, etc. And how many different fragrances can Tide use?
Do you agree with my observation?
We recently went out for the day and we were going to stop at WalMart to pick up cat food, which I was just about out of. I buy Friskies 5.5 ounce cans — they are 44 cents at WalMart. Since it was getting late, and we would pass by Safeway on our way home, we decided to just stop there and probably pay a bit more for the cat food. Well, Friskies 5.5 ounce cans were 74 cents each, almost twice as much as WalMart. Same with ice cream — I love Ben & Jerry's ice cream and it is almost twice as much at Safeway compared to WalMart. I don't mean to get on the band-wagon for WalMart but I can't afford not to shop there.
I love this. I watched Joltin Joe Biden tell the entire world that he and his boy Obama are doing exactly the same things Bush did. What a hoot for him to say that. I bet Cheney peed his pants laughing when he heard Biden say that. This shows how stupid this administration is. The so called leaders of the free world allowing themselves to be baited by a old has been.
It is probably not unusual for current and former officials, especially who have held the same office to disagree and debate issues, but Joe Biden and Dick Cheney have chosen dueling it out on Sunday morning talk shows.
Cheney has been and still is a big part of the problems we are facing today, not a solution. He belongs by law behind bars.
I think he generally disagrees with the way Obama is running things. I think he defiantly wants Obama to change the way he handles things.
I think he is trying to convenience everyone that Obama is wrong and then tell them what Obama should being. And that is what is hurting his administration
People are sick and tired of Obama and his lies & excessive spending on things that don't help our own country. He does more harm than Cheney can ever do.
According to foxnews.com, some passenger became "physically violent" after Romney asked him to adjust his seat from the reclining position in front of Romneys' wife. Romney "did not retaliate" during the fight.
WHY NOT?! He waited until the flight crew "respond to the incident".
If I was on a plane and MY wife was uncomfortable with some JERK reclining in HER lap or MINE, I'd quietly ask him/her to adjust her seat. And if he/she got irate, SO BE IT! Iwouldnt let ANYBODY treat ME or her like a punching bag or get all in MY or HER face like a JERK! I'm no barbarian, but nor am I that passive.
and are there any examples of such misfortune on the net
Once again racism has aired its ugly head
Can remember the child shyly holding her hand (not too sure if it was left or right) in front of the camera…and the look of the mother – who had the sort of face one would pull after the nose being assaulted by cow manure; the look of ultimate pseudo-disgust.
Her da thought it was hilarious…but mum – obviously irked on by the Sun reporter was telling readers that she would go to Hell and back to get little Elizabeth's (or whatever she was called) hand 'back to normal'.
The modern way would be if the wife/partner had a sexual adventure with a black man as the black 'gene' is stronger than the white 'gene' and produces a mixed race child.
And for those saying no its not possible, yeah it is. For example a child's parents may look white but that does not mean they do not carry the gene for a darker skin tone as a throw back from an ancestor.
I can't remember who it was, but way way back a movie star had a black babie and was accused of running around on her husband and they found out that there had been a black person in her family way back.
Obviously I'm not stupid, I can't tell you the exact circumstances! Only her mother knows that for certain.
But no, that is not possible.
I have a lot of stress in my life and someone told me that I needed to find something to do that could be a stress reliever. So I am thinking about writing a journal, but what do I put in it?
your vacations, Christmas, ideas, your favorite quotes, your thoughts and opinions. Usually stuff that you want to remember are the best things you could put in your journal.
Thats what i usually write in my journal. I usually don't write bad stuff that happen to me:)
Hope that helps!
can you go over 19 mins
The man was allowed to oxygen saturate his lungs so he would not need to breath.
Hyper ventilating is what free divers normally do, but to go 3 or 4 minutes for a normal person is a lot after that you need to train yourself to not breath ..
I remember trying to practice that trick in the bathroom sink, in preparation for swimming lessons. We had a swimming teacher that used to chuck a bucket of water over our heads if we wouldn`t put our head under the water. ((
2 mins Lol
Babylonians down Persians togo it seems..
Tags: Do you think he is getting too big for his sandals?
Posted in smo | No Comments »
I usually wouldn't use this for an exact question it's just I do online schooling and I think they shorted me a few of the reading material pages and my teacher isn't online.
I've looked through the internet and the selection has been limited…
Tags: If a copy editor is asked to write a 2-25-1 headline, what does the
Posted in smo | No Comments »
It helps by making sure that everyone involved is responsible and therefore helping (or encouraging) the principly responsible person/organisation.
Also it means that if no one person feels personally responsible that they are more likely to be honest if and when it turns out that something has gone wrong.
It also helps if you are the one to blame as you can shirk your responsibilities more easily.